>well, gans has been in the news lately making two claims: 1)
>unusually high turnout this time (58-60% compared to 54% last time),
>and 2) the spate of new registrants augurs well for dems.
>
>doug, which does your pollster dispute? or is it both?
He doubts the turnout projections, mainly because he doesn't believe Gans, I think. There's certainly other evidence pointing to a high turnout.
Doug