> You said there's no evidence to support the "threat of a good example"
> theory.
There isn't.
> Of course, there's tons of evidence, including the Kissinger-Chile memo
you never reacted to.
Only so much time in a day. That thread had already been beaten to death. I'll admit that I only gave the Kissinger-Chile memo a cursory reading, but nothing jumped out at me as supporting the "threat of a good example" theory.
-- Luke