> >What did Derrida really mean when called for a new international
> in the Spectres of Marx?
> I'm curious about this question: What he _really_ meant? Derrida
> would be the first to say that even he didn't have that kind of
> authority over his texts.
No wonder he ignored my question when I asked Derrida on his Mumbai visit what progress had been made towards building a new international!Perhaps I made a mistake of taking him at face value. :)
>Besides, it's easy enough to read the
> book, though it wouldn't be the Derrida book I'd recommend. :)
Which Derrida book you would recommend?
Ulhas