>
> Regarding OS X's kernel pedigree...
>
>
> I receive conflicting reports. FreeBSD partisans say ver. 3.2 of
> their baby was the source of OS X 10.1 with later versions growing
> from 4.4, netBSD folks make different claims. Apple, on the following
> blurb-a-licious website -
>
> http://www.apple.com/macosx/architecture/
>
> only mentions FreeBSD.
>
>
> But again, I'm not a crank on these matters so if you have other info
> I'd be happy to check it out.
>
My mistake. Sort of shoots my credibility all to hell ;-)
Owen