>But quality, not size, was always the issue for me.
Was there some assay that allowed you to measure the quality of the participants? Must have been very high, to compensate for a turnout of 0.5-0.8% of the advertised million.
>In particular, Earl Silber of the Midwest MWM gave an excellent speech.
So that's the measure of a successful rally? The speeches? I can see this is the stuff of which mass movements are made.
Doug