Changing only the occupants of the White House without changing the most egregious policies of the present occupant -- the root cause of much of anti-incumbent (aka ABB) sentiments -- is largely symbolic. What's purely symbolic is leftists such as yourself and Thomas voting for John Kerry in such one-party states as New York and California, when your votes do NOT even contribute to "evicting the present occupant of the White House" AT ALL. Thomas says that "if Bush wins, in the same manner as 2004, [he] want[s] to be able to point out that he lost the popular vote" -- "winning" the popular vote while losing the electoral college is also nothing but symbolic.
What's usually not symbolic is winning the electoral college -- except that, in 2000, the electoral college, too, turned out to be mostly symbolic! -- Yoshie
* Critical Montages: <http://montages.blogspot.com/> * Greens for Nader: <http://greensfornader.net/> * Bring Them Home Now! <http://www.bringthemhomenow.org/> * OSU-GESO: <http://www.osu-geso.org/> * Calendars of Events in Columbus: <http://sif.org.ohio-state.edu/calendar.html>, <http://www.freepress.org/calendar.php>, & <http://www.cpanews.org/> * Student International Forum: <http://sif.org.ohio-state.edu/> * Committee for Justice in Palestine: <http://www.osudivest.org/> * Al-Awda-Ohio: <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Al-Awda-Ohio> * Solidarity: <http://www.solidarity-us.org/>