> --- Brian Charles Dauth <magcomm at ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
> I do not ignore the ubiquity of moral disagreements; I am just
> seeking a method for arbitrating between them. I find
> cart-before-the-horse proceduralism to be useless in preventing
> persecution and injustice. --
>
> OK, so what do you do when you come across someone who doesn't agree
> with you on what injustice is? Shoot them? Send them to a reeducation
> camp?
The liberal proceduralist also faces that problem with someone who does not agree on the "minima" of the LP's canon; but the proceduralist would rightly insist on reversing the procedural sequence you suggest.
john mage