As to the "broaching" of the lawsuit, that's irrelevant to whether Clinton committed perjury.
Oh dear. You think committing perjury is OK, if you like the perjurer's politics. Oh dear. You don't believe in the rule of law. Oh dear. You like Bill Clinton. Oh dear. You can't see your own hypocrisy. If Bush had committed perjury while in office, you'd be sleeping in front of the White House with your fellow MoveOn rail-greasers. Oh dear.
-----Original Message----- From: lbo-talk-bounces at lbo-talk.org [mailto:lbo-talk-bounces at lbo-talk.org] On Behalf Of Luke Weiger Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 8:10 PM To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] MoveOn v. Bush
----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Dawson" <MDawson at pdx.edu>
> MoveOn.org stinks, stinks, stinks. The gulf between what they advertise
> themselves as doing and what they actually do is wider than any other
> political group since the UJA flew down to liberate San Marcos (and at
least
> the UJA admitted what they went down for). Hell, look at the name -- this
> pathetic travesty of a social movement group is named after the principle
> they first arose to stand for -- "If you like somebody's politics, then
they
> get to commit perjury while in office."
Oh dear. You think providing misleading testimony during a civil trial on an issue that ought not even have been broached constitutes an impeachable offense? Why? Because Christopher Hitchens and his erstwhile pal Ralph Nader said so?
-- Luke
___________________________________ http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk