[lbo-talk] Why Conservatives Are Winning: They Breed

[dano]

At 12:22 PM -0700 9/8/04, mike larkin wrote:
>High fertility, he notes, also correlates strongly with support for 
>President Bush.
>
>Of the top 10 most fertile states, all but one voted for Bush in 2000.

California - where immigration trumps fertility - did not vote for 
Bush in 2000.

How many states - including "red" states and Texas - are seeing 
substantial immigration?
Capturing that group, now and for the future, might be important.