[lbo-talk] Re New Economist Poll: Bad News For Bush

[Carl Remick]

>From: "Nathan Newman" <nathanne at nathannewman.org>
>
>But what is so complicated about saying that Hussein could and should have
>been ousted from power, but Bush screwed it up by not exhausting
>non-military means and, when he went to war, screwing up its execution?

No, I think saying Hussein "could and should have been ousted from power" is 
pretty dumb, too.  Sanctions didn't get rid of Hussein, so what 
"non-military means" are you recommending, psychokinesis?

Carl