>Thomas Seay wrote:
>
>>Yes, but sometimes a Lolita is just a Lolita.
>>It's obviously a hot sexual fetish. Some people are
>>into leather and others want to dress up like a
>>"little girl" and let daddy make them feel good.
>
>The article doesn't offer much support for the fetish angle
By the way, that's why I chose the subject heading - since the look seems not to be fire unto the loins.