[lbo-talk] Ralph Nader, 2001-2003

Steven Gotzler Steve at Gotzler.org
Sun Sep 19 13:44:43 PDT 2004


Actually, that is the wrong question. Of course it is not Nader's fault if people do not read newspapers. But if he is serious about reaching people it is HIS problem how to reach them. Press is quite a bit more than newspapers. Just putting out some nice ideas is pretty much worthless. If someone wants to reach people it is the reachers duty to reach, not the reachees duty.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Yoshie Furuhashi" <furuhashi.1 at osu.edu> To: <lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org>; <furuhashi.1 at osu.edu> Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2004 4:19 PM Subject: [lbo-talk] Ralph Nader, 2001-2003


> >2) Of course he's not going to get press coverage (though he'd get more
> >of it than you or I would). No serious reformer or radical is ever going
> >to get much press coverage, except to smear. You gotta work around that.
> >But if almost none of the subscribers to this list heard about much of
> >what Ralph did between 2001 and 2003, who did?
>>
>>Doug
>
> If LBO-talk subscribers in particular or Americans in general do not read
> newspapers, is it Ralph Nader's fault? :->
>
> <blockquote>The Boston Globe
> November 11, 2001, Sunday ,THIRD EDITION
> SECTION: METRO/REGION; Pg. B5
> LENGTH: 413 words
> HEADLINE: NADER CALLS US WAR 'RIVERBOAT GAMBLE'
> BYLINE: By Joe Spurr, and Jenny Jiang, Globe Correspondents
>
> Ralph Nader's criticisms of the federal government during last year's
> presidential race haven't shrunk. They've grown.
>
> Calling the US war in Afghanistan "a riverboat gamble," Nader said
> President Bush is "basically in the process of burning down the haystack
> to find the needle."
>
> In an interview yesterday with the Globe before speaking at a peace rally
> in Boston, Nader argued that a blend of "bribes, spies, and limited
> military action, coupled with a big humanitarian effort by the UN" would
> be more effective and minimize the costs to innocent civilians.
>
> "You have to ask yourself, 'What happens after you catch the backers of
> the attackers and you leave . . . behind an extremely devastated society
> bitter?' " Nader said.
>
> He addressed a near-capacity crowd at the 2,700-seat Orpheum Theatre
> during the "Democracy Rising" tour, a series of rallies to bring local and
> national groups together on such issues as universal health care and clean
> elections.
>
> The crowd clapped as they watched excerpts from an independent documentary
> on peace rallies in Washington and New York after the Sept. 11 attacks.
>
> "I think that Americans do feel an impulse to support their government at
> this time," said John Brett, a senior at Dartmouth College. But "even
> though the polls show that the majority of Americans support some sort of
> action, they may not support the actual measures put in place by the
> government."
>
> Sitting in the lobby of the Omni Parker House hotel before the rally,
> Nader said that not only would thousands of Afghan civilians suffer as a
> result of the US military campaign, but the strikes may foster deeper
> resentment toward the United States.
>
> "If we reconstruct Afghanistan, we could come out ahead with the people
> because the Taliban is very repressive," Nader said. "But we've never done
> that since the Marshall Plan in Europe. Every time we get involved -
> Somalia, Grenada, Panama - we back out like the Wild West tavern guys
> backing out with their six-guns flaming."
>
> History has shown that once the pressure is off, Congress is less likely
> to appropriate money for reconstruction, Nader said.
>
> "Now, maybe it'll be different this time, because they need Afghanistan
> for a pipeline and other interests," Nader said. "Suddenly, Afghanistan
> becomes strategic."
>
> He accused the Bush administration of capitalizing on the "thought
> conformity" in Capitol Hill and creating a climate where dissent is viewed
> as being unpatriotic, un-American.</blockquote>
>
> Search Lexis-Nexis with the term "Ralph Nader" in the headlines or lead
> paragraphs of articles in "major papers," and you'll get 403 articles in
> 2001, 347 in 2002, 258 in 2003. Broaden the parameters from the headlines
> or lead paragraphs to full texts, and you'll get even more: 957 articles
> in 2001, 873 in 2002, and 667 in 2003. *No leftist, not even Michael
> Moore or Noam Chomsky or Howard Zinn, compares to Ralph Nader's ability to
> draw audiences and generate media coverage* (even in the years when he is
> not running for any political office!).
> --
> Yoshie
>
> * Critical Montages: <http://montages.blogspot.com/>
> * Greens for Nader: <http://greensfornader.net/>
> * Bring Them Home Now! <http://www.bringthemhomenow.org/>
> * Calendars of Events in Columbus:
> <http://sif.org.ohio-state.edu/calendar.html>,
> <http://www.freepress.org/calendar.php>, & <http://www.cpanews.org/>
> * Student International Forum: <http://sif.org.ohio-state.edu/>
> * Committee for Justice in Palestine: <http://www.osudivest.org/>
> * Al-Awda-Ohio: <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Al-Awda-Ohio>
> * Solidarity: <http://www.solidarity-us.org/>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
>
>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list