[lbo-talk] China

Michael Dawson MDawson at pdx.edu
Thu Sep 23 17:00:24 PDT 2004


See, Doug: The real radical just doesn't bother explaining "individuals," political parties, or actual cases of social change. Such things are inscrutable at best, see? And none of them are even mentioned in the Theses on Feuerbach! After all, doesn't that guy condemn merely "describing" the world? And if Mao can't have a crystal ball, why should we mere peons expect to make one?

-----Original Message----- From: lbo-talk-bounces at lbo-talk.org [mailto:lbo-talk-bounces at lbo-talk.org] On Behalf Of Doug Henwood Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 3:02 PM To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org Subject: [lbo-talk] China

Carrol Cox wrote:


>Why do you want one? The Chinese people struggled, but, for the present,
>they have lost. Simple enough. What good is an explanation, except
>perhaps for antiquarians of the future? It seems a commonplace enough
>matter that most revolutions lose. Why should one expect otherwise?
>Human history is not a Dick & Jane reader.

Wow, an early approximation of an answer. So the failure is just one of those things? It had nothing to do with China's level of development or the structure of the Chinese CP? Nothing to be learned for the future? Is this just another way of saying shit happens?

Doug ___________________________________ http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list