[lbo-talk] Future

Yoshie Furuhashi furuhashi.1 at osu.edu
Tue Sep 28 11:16:28 PDT 2004



>Carrol Cox wrote:
>
>>The beauty of statements such as "Many X's believe P" is that it can't
>>possibly be false, so it can't be worth a damn as well.
>
>As far as I can tell, the tenets of Cox Thought are:
>
>1) The world is just a series of endless particularities;
>generalizations are impossible. That makes theory impossible, too.
>
>2) History just happens; we can't predict events or explain them
>after they occur.
>
>3) Revolutions and other political earthquakes just happen, too;
>there's no way to persuade the unpersuaded. Therefore politics
>consists mainly of talking among ourselves, and holding small
>demonstrations whose principal point is doing a census of our tiny
>numbers.
>
>Of course, I've just violated proposition 1). Sorry.
>
>Doug

If you didn't make a caricature of what Carrol had been saying over many years, you would admit that you actually agreed with him. To take just one example, it is extremely difficult to make a prediction about political development even in the near future, let alone in the distant future, and I haven't seen you venture too many of them. As a matter of fact, you are probably more conservative about making a bet on a future direction of economy than most people making a living writing about it.

As for the size of any unprecedented political gathering, it doesn't necessarily tell you anything about its future prospect. How many people attended the first convention to discuss the social, civil, and religious condition and rights of women at Seneca Falls in 1848? About 300. How many of them signed the Declaration of Sentiments? 68 women and 32 men (at <http://www.nps.gov/wori/senecafalls1848.htm>). I'm sure those who organized or attended it were told not to waste time holding such a tiny assembly and to wait until the idea caught on and they got more women and men on their side.

Yoshie



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list