<html>
Alexandre Fenelon writes:<br>
<br>
<blockquote type=cite cite>>I know the estimates have been criticized
(e.g. by Reddy and Pogge) as too<br>
>low, but the official stats are pretty damning as it is.<br>
><br>
>Doug<br>
<br>
<br>
And, Reddy and Pogge point out, that poverty measurement is
inherently<br>
likely show progress over time even if, in fact, there hasn't been
any.<br>
<br>
Paul<br>
<br>
<br>
-Any online references?<br>
<br>
Alexandre</blockquote><br>
The authors seem to have recently started a small Center and a website
devoted to this issue. It has the latest version of the paper
(which has been often revised), related papers, and news articles:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.socialanalysis.org/">http</a>://www.socialanalysis.<a href="http://www.socialanalysis.org/">org<br>
<br>
</a>This new site is sometimes down. You can also try:<br>
<a href="http://www.columbia.edu/~sr793/count.pdf" eudora="autourl">http://www.columbia.edu/~sr793/count.</a><a href="http://www.columbia.edu/~sr793/count.pdf" eudora="autourl">pdf</a>
<br>
<br>
The main paper is not easy going but they have done good work. Enjoy.<br>
Paul<br>
<br>
</html>