<DIV>Of course, the subtext to all this is the rich oil guy in prison.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><!--StartFragment-->BBC Monitoring<BR>Russian finance minister urges oligarchs to show social responsibility<BR>Source: RTR Russia TV, Moscow, in Russian 1600 gmt 25 Apr 04<BR><BR>[Presenter Sergey Brilev] Four billionaires and several dozen oligarchs who <BR>own smaller fortunes account for 60 per cent of [Russia's] GDP. They all <BR>gathered in one hall - at the Queen Elizabeth II conference centre in <BR>London. Several Rolls Royce and Bentley limousines at the entrance <BR>indicated the presence of Russians. It was here, in London, that the <BR>Russian Economic Forum, or Russian Davos, took place [on 19 April].<BR><BR>[passage omitted: more details about the forum and its delegates]<BR><BR>On the forum opening day a sensational recount of a conversation with the <BR>Russian finance minister [Aleksey Kudrin] was published in the London-based <BR>newspaper The Times. The sensation is in the first paragraph: Within the <BR>next four years oligarchs may be subject to
amnesty if they follow the new <BR>rules. Most probably, an amnesty to the capital was meant. As regards those <BR>who have already been punished, no amnesty is being prepared for them.<BR><BR>In an interview with our programme, Kudrin said The Times journalists <BR>twisted his words after all. Nonetheless, the newspaper put the phrase <BR>about the "new rules" in quotation marks, which means that this is a quote.<BR><BR>It was raining in London [Video shows Kudrin being interviewed by Brilev <BR>near the Houses of Parliament]<BR><BR>[Brilev] What do the words new rules mean? What are these new rules that <BR>the Russian businesses must follow?<BR><BR>[Kudrin] The thing is that we were discussing social responsibility of <BR>businesses in Russia. The attention to this subject has been drawn. I <BR>mentioned the three aspects which, in my personal opinion, can be <BR>attributed to social responsibility. First, this is the payment of taxes, <BR>honest payment, not the payment through
offshore companies.<BR><BR>[Q] Does this include backdated payments?<BR><BR>[Kudrin] No, I have in mind, first and foremost, the payment of current <BR>taxes. Second, this should be participation in charitable activities. I <BR>stress that the payment of taxes should go first because businesses that <BR>transfer the sums subject to taxation to offshore companies and then <BR>declare their involvement in charitable activities, are actually exercising <BR>false charity. At first they take the money away from the teachers and <BR>doctors in the regions where they should pay taxes into the local budgets <BR>and then they declare that a smaller portion of that money will be used for <BR>charitable activities.<BR><BR>Third, support should be given to the political forces that care about the <BR>development of the country and promote its democratic values. When a member <BR>of the board of directors of a very well-known oil company supports the <BR>Communists, who propose that the entire
oil industry should be privatized, <BR>personally I have doubts that these people demonstrate any social <BR>responsibility.<BR><BR>Also, one can hardly speak of any social responsibility in the situation <BR>where some shareholders support the right-wingers, whereas other <BR>shareholders in the same company support the left-wingers.<BR><BR>I believe that these are normal rules which must always be in place.<BR><BR>[passage omitted: Kudrin said more companies were now paying taxes in full <BR>and on time. He also said that those who resorted to illegal methods in the <BR>1990s taking advantage of the state's weakness had no excuse, and urged <BR>Russians to keep their savings in roubles]<BR></DIV><p>
                <hr size=1><font face=arial size=-1>Do you Yahoo!?<br>
Yahoo! Photos: <a href="http://pa.yahoo.com/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=23765/*http://photos.yahoo.c
om/ph/print_splash">High-quality 4x6 digital prints for 25¢</a>