<DIV><BR><BR><B><I>Liza Featherstone <lfeather@panix.com></I></B> wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">
<P>Isn't it mostly because more people share Perot's politics than Nader's? I<BR>mean for all the complex reasons leftists don't win elections yet, there's<BR>really no getting around the fact that a lot of people don't agree with us.<BR><BR>Liza<BR><BR>Yes, support for Perot in '92 was very articulate and strategic; people who backed him could cite his views on any number of issues; the ones I met had very well developed views, compared to most folks. Also a greater tendency to political action compared to liberals; lots of first hand involvement in GOTV, etc.</P>
<P>Support for Nader (like for Jerry Brown in '92) in my observation is confined to people with little experience of electoral politics. </P></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><p>
<hr size=1><font face=arial size=-1>Do you Yahoo!?<br><a href="http://pa.yahoo.com/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/hotjobs/hotjobs_mail_signature_footer_textlink/evt=23983/*http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover">Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs </a>