<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
<pre wrap="">"Brian Charles Dauth"
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""><span class="moz-txt-citetags">> </span>How about violence worked to end slavery in the U.S.? John Brown.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->...
You are right. There always must be struggle. I guess I wonder at which
point is violence acceptable and how to know when to stop.</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""><span class="moz-txt-citetags">> </span>Or Cuba. It took an armed struggle for the initial victory of the
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->revolution in Cuba;
Agreed. But look at the consequences: queers put into concentration camps.
Clearly Castro did not know when to stop the violence (he also later
imprisoned people with HIV/AIDS). Is that a success?
Once the ball of violence starts is it possible to contain it? How do you
determine when the objective(s) of the violence has been achieved?
Brian Dauth
Queer Buddhist Resister
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Comment:
Brian: I thought that you in particular, might be interested in an anecdote regarding the recent visits of the Dalai Lama.
The DL recently visited Canada & a great brouhoua arose, & there has been quite a flurry of activity/interest around this.
As an example, one of my research fellows spent $1000 for a private interview with the DL.
>From this you may gauge the extraordinary personal impacts that Hoxhaists have on the people around them.
Anyway, transpires that this was in a huge room with some 100 others.
Because of the putative health benefits of Bhuddist reflection (actually, the literature usually talks of meditation without the descriptor Bhuddist - & the same applies with various non-Bhuddist meditations including some Hindu derivatives. I have not seen literature re the more ascetic Christian variants of meditation etc).
In an aired radio interview with a psychology researcher from Duke, the DL was asked whether if he was sitting next to hitler he would kill him.
The DL consulted apparently with his colleague lamas, & then said along the lines:
"Yes - I would kill him if I cold. But the important thing is to do it without any anger in your heart".
Now I think the DL is a sort of nice chap - all giggly etc. This was a revealing comment.
My sister who is a Hindu 'guru' - uses similar terminology, the great sin is 'attachment. She counts the DL as a personal friend.
However an oft held option is that to kill in "cold blood" - is an especially vicious & dangerous thing.
I pass no value judgment here.
Just stringing together some reported facts, & personal reminisce.
Cheers.
H
</pre>
</body>
</html>