<DIV>He is not talking about the physical self. He is talking about the metaphysical subject. Read some Hume.<BR><BR><B><I>Bill Bartlett <billbartlett@dodo.com.au></I></B> wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">At 9:13 AM -0400 14/6/04, BklynMagus wrote:<BR><BR>>Bill asked about not existing.<BR>><BR>>I have posted several times on what I mean. If you check the <BR>>archives you will be able to find it.<BR><BR>Saw it, made no sense to me, thought you might be able to re-phrase <BR>it. Or had maybe thought about it some more. Still makes no sense to <BR>me to claim that people don't exist.<BR><BR>><BR>>Also, any good site on Buddhist thought/philosophy and the concept <BR>>of no-self will do just as well (and probably even better).<BR><BR>Life is too short to spend it trying to understand why some people <BR>claim that we don't physically exist. There are far more interesting <BR>delusions and frankly its all I can do to keep up with the real <BR>world. Obviously you don't even understand it yourself, or you'd be <BR>able to explain it.<BR><BR>Bill Bartlett<BR>Bracknell
Tas<BR>___________________________________<BR>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><p>
<hr size=1>Do you Yahoo!?<br>Friends. Fun. <a href="http://messenger.yahoo.com/">Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger</a>