<html>
<body>
<font size=3>At 10:17 AM 10/22/2004, Doug Henwood wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Carrol Cox wrote:<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Periods of<br>
change, moreover, _always_ catch us by surprise (as the 1917
revolution<br>
caught everyone, including Lenin and the Bolsheviks, by surprise).<br>
Nevertheless, our current activity should be grounded in the
assumption<br>
that such a surprise is coming, else we _will_ never even be
remotely<br>
ready for it when it does come.</blockquote><br><br>
<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">The people who share our
principles are out there, and reaching them<br>
around programs in which they can actively participate (as opposed
to<br>
the passivity of voting out of desperation for someone whose
principles<br>
they oppose) is the task of leftists today. That task is furthered
both<br>
by the MWM and the Nader campaign; it is frustrated by the
despairing<br>
surrender of so many leftists to the ABB.</blockquote><br>
If periods of great social change take us by surprise, then how do you
know that such marginal bits of wankery as the Nader campaign and the MWM
will contribute anything to it? You must have some confidence that the
surprise won't really be much of a surprise - it you just keep flapping
your arms in the familiar manner, then history will finally fall into
line behind you.<br><br>
Doug</font></blockquote><br><br>
According to reviews Gould ended up gutting the theory of punctuated
equilibrium:<br><br>
<br>
<pre>I read this book review (9.28.02 issue of The New Yorker, H Allen
Orr) and thought it was interesting. Haven't had a chance to read the
book, though. According to the review, Gould ended up reassessing his
claims about "punctuated equilibrium." Gould conceded that
change happens all the time.
So, why the appearance of a pattern in the fossil record? "only if
species split do the resulting differences last long enough to have a
shot at showing up as fossils". From what the reviewer has
argued, PE has been gutted as a theory of change and resurrected as a
theory of why the fossil record appears as it does. An excerpt from TSET,
<<a href="http://www.stephenjaygould.org/library/gould_structure.html">http://www.stephenjaygould.org/library/gould_structure.html</a>>
</pre><font size=3>See also the wikipedia entry which explains the
popular misunderstandings about the concept.<br><br>
<br>
Kelley<br><br>
<br>
<x-sigsep><p></x-sigsep>
"We live under the Confederacy. <br>
We're a podunk bunch of swaggering <br>
pious hicks." <br><br>
--Bruce Sterling</font></body>
</html>