<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><HTML><FONT SIZE=2 PTSIZE=10>In a message dated 11/8/04 9:21:41 AM Eastern Standard Time, lbo-talk-request@lbo-talk.org writes:<BR>
<BR>
Jon Johaniing wrote:<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">I would say that intelligent believers simply make a choice, conscious <BR>
or not, not to push their skeptical rational activities into areas that <BR>
would shake their faith. After all, we all have the ability to choose <BR>
what to think about and what not to.<BR>
<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
<BR>
Official Catholic doctrine has always held that the teachings of the church must be accepted on faith. Even Christendom's greatest thinkers--from Anselm to Acquinas, with their famous proofs, ontological and cosmological, for the existence of God--taught that these arguments could only bolster the faith of believers and perhaps help to convert heathens, but should never be considered an independent basis for belief. </FONT></HTML>