[lbo-talk] Churchill Sets Limits on Academic Freedom of Speech [he did?]

Leigh Meyers leighcmeyers at gmail.com
Sat Apr 2 16:41:19 PST 2005


In an ----- Original Message ----- From: Doug Henwood To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2005 3:32 PM Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] Churchill Sets Limits on Academic Freedom of Speech

Doug wrote that: Thomas Brown wrote:


>I'm calling on you to return to the land of reason, logic, and evidence.

Given the history of the U.S. treatment of Indians, a horror story that keeps getting retold in the present, I think it's really weird that someone would devote so much energy to attempting to prove a particular incident of genocide didn't happen. What's the point, other than to attract attention to yourself and make white people feel better about themselves? Yuck.

Doug

Something I posted a short while back bears repeating here:

It's not just history... genocide(ethnocide?) is a current event.

----- Original Message ----- From: Leigh Meyers To: leigh_m ; lbo-talk Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 6:40 PM Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] Churchill and Thomas Brown

<...> For what it's worth, I was listening to BBC the other evening and they were covering Malaria abatement in Africa. One of the things being discussed was the distribution of insecticide treated tents.

I considered ripping it to an Mp3 for posterity, but I didn't... figuring I'd find it on the BBC website.

Nope.

The story was there... but no mention of the tents.

Or the type of "insecticide"...

L http://www.leighm.net <...>

I WOULD suppose that it's not the 6-11 mosquito repellent that you'd normally buy at a supermarket or sporting goods store, and I'm sure it hasn't been tested on Americans or "white people" yet.

. . .



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list