Carl
>From: andie nachgeborenen <andie_nachgeborenen at yahoo.com>
>
>Has it occurred to you that the last figure of the
>first magnitude on this list died over 120 years ago?
>No disrespect to Sweezey, but he wouldn't put himself
>in that list either. Andthere have not been any
>successors, either. When does a reserach program start
>to degenerate? How many scores of years do you wait
>without progress before give up?
>
>--- T Fast <tfast at yorku.ca> wrote:
> > >
> > > And it weakens the book massively: economists and
> > others who key on the
> > > formal analytical model quickly find that it
> > doesn't make much sense, and
> > > those who strive to prove that it does, somehow,
> > make sense... vanish into
> > > the swamp and are never seen again.
> > >
> > > As someone's advisor once said, LTV has ruined
> > more good minds than LSD...
> >
> > > Yours,
> > >
> > > Brad DeLong
> >
> > Except of course for all those who took it on and
> > became famous: Smith,
> > Ricardo, Marx, Sweezy. As for you...well your best
> > hope is to stick with
> > the LSD.
> >
> > Yours,
> >
> > Travis
> >
> > ___________________________________
> >
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
> >
>
>
>
>__________________________________
>Yahoo! Messenger
>Show us what our next emoticon should look like. Join the fun.
>http://www.advision.webevents.yahoo.com/emoticontest
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk