[lbo-talk] Labor in the US ( was Salon on Andrea Dworkin)

amadeus amadeus amadeus482000 at yahoo.com
Wed Apr 13 15:37:29 PDT 2005


The US political system, as set into motion by the Constitution, ensures the dominance of the two most hyper-capitalist parties. This means that the working class, to the extent that it is politicized at all, ends up relying on a political party that does not represent their economic interests in any way. This paves the way for reactionary propaganda from capitalists, who control a consolidated media. I really don't think we can look at class politics in the US without making critical analyses of the media. The half-trillion yearly in wage surplus extracted from the existing labor bureaucracy might best be put into creating democratically controlled worker-run media.

I don't believe that US workers are inherently reactionary, but the political system has left us with no other choice; this explains why many workers do not vote in the united states to begin with, let alone in a majority for this or that political party. People talk about the degree to which Sunnis boycotted the interim Iraq elections; well, there has been an unofficial, de facto vote boycott by the working class in the United States for 50 or so years. The blame does not rest on workers per se so much as it rests on, among other things, a labor bureaucracy which pisses away hundreds of billions of dollars on the Democratic Party. I was a teamster in '04 and I watched them push through an endorsement of Dick Gephardt. What the fuck was that?

Most European states have ruling political parties which are nominally 'socialist', though they are really simply various strains of liberal-reformist and state-monopoly capitalism. This at least indicates a mass worker consciousness, however flawed, which we do not have in the united states.

The ruling class has used numberous propaganda mechanisms and resource schematics to divide the working class around racialist lines in particular since the US began. Identity politics is one continuation of this stratagem by other means. Identity politics changed the personification of capital, but not capital itself.

This crap will not work forever, though. No crap does. --adx --- joanna bujes <jbujes at covad.net> wrote:
>
>
> Wojtek Sokolowski wrote:
>
> >Which makes me wonder, why is the US left so
> crackpot and way in the left
> >field? What happened to the good old social
> democrats or socialists - which
> >are legitimate political parties in Europe and
> elsewhere?
> >
> Because
>
> 1. They're organized around consumption (lifestyle)
> rather than production.
> 2. Racism.
> 3. Identity Politics (which I guess is another spin
> on 1. and 2.)
> 4. Americans are intensely uncomfortable with
> politics/history.
> 5. ???
>
> >
> >
>
>
> ___________________________________
>
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>

"Mary Poppins is alive and well in Argentina, she sends her regards." - Rod McKuen, The Mud Kids

__________________________________ Yahoo! Mail Mobile Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone. http://mobile.yahoo.com/learn/mail



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list