[lbo-talk] Re: gorgeous moscow subway stations

Carl Remick carlremick at hotmail.com
Wed Apr 20 11:19:50 PDT 2005



>From: snitsnat <snitilicious at tampabay.rr.com>
>
>... I don't see any despair going on. They want what you have: a decent
>job, an affordable roof over their heads, health and retirement benefits,
>an opportunity to get out of a small town, the chance to learn, and a sense
>of meaning and purpose in their life.
>
>Those aren't unreasonable things to want and a $10/hr job at Goodyear or a
>minimum wage job at a junkyard does not afford those things. R's friend,
>Shane, works in a junkyard. He has a four year-old from his marriage, who
>he raises by himself. He can only survive because he lives in a trailer on
>his dad's property. It's a modest property and they managed to pay it off
>10 yrs. ago --when they both worked at a Tupperware plant and had benefits.
>These people do not aspire to have designer clothes or status jobs. All
>Mike wants to do is keep his repair shop running and his wife would like to
>have hands that don't ache from the factory work so she can do something
>she enjoys--upholstery work. These folk can't imagine wanting these things
>because it is not their lot in life. When they see fancy schmancy homes on
>the TeeVee their response is, "Yeahsureright. Who can possibly afford
>that?" This is because no one in their circle afford that." To them, the
>idea that plenty of people live in those fancy schmancy homes is not real.
>...

I hate to be crude, simplistic and "unrealistic," but I don't see any solution to this problem other than socialism of some type. Without strict controls on disparities of income and wealth, there can be no genuine social progress.

I don't think the problem for most Americans is aesthetics at all but a deepening sense of *material* insecurity -- the problem of having an ever dwindling number of constants in your life (steady earnings, fringe benefits, SS, etc.) to help in planning for housing, healthcare and retirement needs. Adding more agita, amid all those anxieties over life's essentials one is constantly being clobbered over the head with news of the latest gargantuan rewards being lavished on the celebrity class for no goddamned reason at. My latest pet peeve is the $38 million dollars that Sarah Jessica Parker got paid for doing an aborted *failed* ad campaign for the Gap. Reportedly SJP is PO'd at the Gap for terminating her campaign early and hiring a younger pitchperson, Joss Stone. SJP is said to have considered Gap's handling of her dismissal "a bit of a snub." Shed a tear for SJP!

Carl



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list