Having said this, however, I wonder why you're so kind to Cox, Doug. This guy is, to toy with Einstein, 2 percent thought and 97 percent position-taking. He has no idea about anything except what he's read, and even that seems to be petrified.
> Doug Henwood wrote:
> >
> > Now many of
> > us are backward looking,
>
> There you go again.
>
> Many of us are X? (How many? Describe some specific and important
> currents on the left -- naming core individuals -- who areX?_
>
> Therefor many of us are _not_ X.
>
> Don't you get tired of empty tautologies?
>
> Carrol