[lbo-talk] Alex Cockburn on India: wrong? (was, U.N. seeks aid...)

Michael Pugliese michael.098762001 at gmail.com
Wed Aug 10 12:17:48 PDT 2005


On 8/10/05, Sujeet Bhatt <sujeet.bhatt at gmail.com> wrote:


> As Kuhn and Lakatos have pointed out in another context, cherished
> theories are exceptionally resistant to facts. It takes a 'revolution'
> to sweep them aside.
>
> Sujeet

Once again, anyone else look at this critique of dependency theory? Robert Packenham. 1992. The Dependency Movement: Scholarship and Politics in Development Studies. Harvard University Press. http://www.hup.harvard.edu/reviews/PACDEP_R.html (Kenneth Maxwell who was purged from his gig at Foreign Affairs as book reviewer due to pressure from Kissinger.) A fascinating, relentless and extensively documented look at the politicization of the American academic community and what [the author] sees as its Marxist roots...It exposes many of the follies and hypocrisies within the Latin Americanist precinct.

--Kenneth Maxwell, Foreign Affairs http://www.hup.harvard.edu/reviews/PACDEP_R.html -- Michael Pugliese



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list