--- Miles Jackson <cqmv at pdx.edu> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, BklynMagus wrote:
>
> > That was part of what ACT UP fought for. Drug
> decisions
> > should be in the hands of the patients, not the
> bureaucrats.
> > All the long-term suvivors/non-progressors I know
> are
> > people who took control of their lives and their
> drug regimens,
> > instead of meekly following the state's prescribed
> path of
> > death.
>
> It's a bit more complicated than that: patients
> can't know
> what drug regimens are helpful or dangerous until
> those
> pesky scientists actually do research and that pesky
> FDA
> assesses that research in a rigorous way. Granted,
> the
> pharma influence is troubling, but overall far more
> lives
> have been saved by the existence of the FDA
> bureaucracy
> than have been lost. --Consider: if people really
> "took control" of their own drug regimens, many of
> them
> would be swayed by anecdotal evidence, charismatic
> charlatans, placebo effects, etc., and they would
> expose
> themselves to ineffective drugs or drugs that
> actually
> endanger their health.
>
> Miles
>
> ___________________________________
>
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com