These numbers aren't strong enough to prove any hypothesis I know about. A genetic heritability hypothesis would demand stronger correlation and a hypothesis that homosexuality is independent of genetics would demand a smaller correlation. So the best we can say is that it's seems likely that homosexuality corresponds to some unknown mechanism which has a heritable component, which is not saying much.
What's more interesting is that homosexuality is consistently expressed in both humans and our close relatives much more often than in most higher vertebrates. This suggests that homosexuality has probably been with us and our recent ancestors for hundreds of thousands of years. That does suggest that homosexuality may well be associated with something that is positively adaptive or positively adaptive in itself. It's clear that homosexuality COULD have a negative effect on reproductive success. It hasn't. In fact, at the time when we and our close ancestors were having phenomenal reproductive and survival success, we were probably expressing, as a population, this homosexual behavior.
One simple "explaination" for homosexuality ****might**** be our hypersexuality. In a slow-reproducing species with offspring that take a long time to develop, hypersexuality woud tend to insure maximum fecundity and encourage increased social bonding between males and females. If hypersexuality also produced homosexual behavior, this might increase same-sex bonding.
This theory has the fun sociological implication that sex-positivity is positively adaptive and sex-negative ideas are negative and atavistic in a real sense.
boddi