Joanna
Chris Doss wrote:
>Just to be a stickler, the Crimean Tatars were finally
>allowd to return in the 1990s (but a lot have gone to
>Turkey).
>
>Personally I think the idea of people "deserving an
>ancestral homeland" sounds kind of volkish.
>
>--- Michael Hirsch <mmh655 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>>Joanna:
>>
>>What exactly do you support? The ideal of a unitary
>>secular state or the
>>reality of a Middle Eastern peace? If I thought for
>>a moment that a secular
>>bi-or multi-national state were possible in
>>Palestine, I'd jettison any
>>support for a two-state solution. It cannot happen.
>>Not in our lifetimes.
>>The author's airy talk about KKK politics is gallery
>>rhetoric and beside the
>>point. Populations are routinely routed in wars.
>>It's lousy; it must stop.
>> And it's the outcome of military conflict, which
>>must stop. Want to make
>>any peace settlement contingent on the right of
>>return? Want to resettle the
>>Sudeten Germans, too? How about the pro-fascist
>>Crimean Tatars. Or is it
>>just the uprooted and oppressed Palestinians who
>>deserve an ancestral
>>homeland? Chomsky hasn't become a Zionist cats paw
>>and it's a dumb,
>>self-congratulatory if not self-referential argument
>>to say he has. So I ask
>>again, what's to agree with?
>>
>>Mike Hirsch
>>
>>
>>
>
>Nu, zayats, pogodi!
>
>
>
>__________________________________
>Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
>http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
>
>
-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <../attachments/20051205/68277729/attachment.htm>