[lbo-talk] Question re: Religion vs "spirituality"

[boddi satva]

I don't know, it seems to me most of the time people assert God into
their arguments without specifying the qualities of the God they
hypothesize. It's not enough to say, for example, "a creator". You
have to hypothesize how this God might have created. Most of the time
people seem to posit "a creator with all the powers He needed to do
whatever I think He did but in a way which is invisible" and that's
ridiculous.

boddi

On 12/5/05, ravi <listmail at kreise.org> wrote:
> At around 3/12/05 5:49 am, boddi satva wrote:
> > What we can say is that there are no known, reproducible observations
> > which logically imply the existence of God.
> >
>
> Well, depends on what we mean by logical implication, yes? Godel,
> underdetermination, etc...
>
>        --ravi (don't believe in god)
>
> --
> If you wish to contact me, you will get my attention faster by
> substituting "r" for "listmail" in my email address. Thank you!
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>