[lbo-talk] Murtha vs Junior...

Leigh Meyers leighcmeyers at gmail.com
Wed Dec 7 16:45:43 PST 2005


On Wednesday, December 07, 2005 3:03 PM [PDT], Ira Glazer <ira at yanua.com> wrote:


> You have to admit that Murtha's straightforwardness is extremely
> refreshing, wit:
>
>

Washingtonpost.com:

Rep. Murtha Holds a News Conference to Respond to President Bush's Speech

Courtesy FDCH eMedia Wednesday, December 7, 2005; 2:46 PM

DECEMBER 7, 2005

SPEAKER: U.S. REPRESENTATIVE JOHN MURTHA (D-PA)

[*]

MURTHA: Let me start by going through a timeline and then get to what the president said.

In May 1, 2003, the president declared it was a major -- end of major operations. Then he sent John Hamre to Iraq. John Hamre was undersecretary of defense in the Clinton administration. And he found all kinds of problems. He said: You got three months, three critical months to get this thing under control if you want to control the security; 12 months at the most, but three months are crucial, the first three months.

He said small things like sewage and water and things that a lot of people don't pay attention to -- I pay attention, because in my district that's important. But a lot of people paid no attention to that report.

MURTHA: I went there -- now this was July that Hamre made his report and it was a very prescient report. I mean, it was a very accurate report about the predictions of what was going to happen. And we have a copy of it here for you.

In August 16th, I went to Iraq, from August 16th to the 20th. When I came back, I said to Secretary Rumsfeld: We require immediate attention of body armor. They said they were prepared. They said they had what they needed.

Forty thousand troops didn't have body armor. They needed armored Humvees. They needed jammers and Kevlar blankets they asked for. This was all levels of people in Iraq at the time.

And then I wrote to the president on September 4th and I said, "I believe you have miscalculated the magnitude of the effort we are facing. We should energize, Iraqitize and internationalize this effort."

And we have copies of that letter in there.

Then we had the $87 billion supplemental in October of 2003.

I said on the floor that I felt the most important part of that supplemental was the construction money. A lot of people voted against it because they didn't think we should be spending money in Iraq for construction when Wolfowitz, Assistant Secretary Wolfowitz, had said: It's going to be paid for by oil money.

So a lot of people opposed it on the floor, but it passed handily.

Then I went back to Iraq and I told Ambassador Bremer, General Sanchez and General Odierno and the young general that was their public relations guy, "You guys are way too optimistic about this."

[More] >> http://leighmdotnet.blogspot.com/2005/12/every-single-convoy-was-attacked-that.html

Leigh www.leighm.net

Have you seen my newsfeeds?: http://leighmdotnet.blogspot.com/ Got RSS?: http://www.furl.net/members/leighm/rss.xml



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list