If you think asking a question about fundamental assumptions is theological, but that would be pretty stupid.
--- Carrol Cox <cbcox at ilstu.edu> wrote:
>
> This seems to be a variation on the uninteresting
> question of "Why is
> there something rather than nothing." Carl Estabrook
> pointed out a
> couple months ago that the real line between atheism
> and non-atheism is
> whether one takes this question seriously or not. I
> for one do not find
> it interesting. Hence in Carl's sense, I am a true
> atheist. Chris seems
> here to be demanding that physical science answer a
> theological
> question.
>
> Carrol
> ___________________________________
>
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
Nu, zayats, pogodi!
__________________________________ Yahoo! for Good - Make a difference this year. http://brand.yahoo.com/cybergivingweek2005/