[lbo-talk] Mr. Churchill

louis kontos louis.kontos at liu.edu
Fri Feb 4 16:04:34 PST 2005


who would you have judge whether he is willfully publishing crap? half of sociology strikes me as crap, but i wouldn't give anybody the right to punish anybody for it.

On Feb 4, 2005, at 10:38 AM, Wojtek Sokolowski wrote:


> Doug:
>> Good question. I thought that essay was a horrid piece of crap, but
>> the guy should be allowed to speak in public and shouldn't get fired.
>
> Why? If, say, a bus driver drives his bus recklessly, or if a doctor
> performs a crappy procedure in a reckless manner - most people would
> agree
> that these workers should face a disciplinary or even legal action for
> their
> miscounduct. Why are the symbol manipulating professions different?
>
> I am just posing it as a hypothetical question. I understand that
> Churchill
> is being singled out and what's at stake here is not his sloppy
> writing but
> censorship - which does require a strong defence. But let's suppose
> that a
> university does institute a fairly balanced system of punishments for
> mental
> / research workers who willfully publish crap. Why is this wrong?
>
> Wojtek
>
>
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list