[lbo-talk] "Go Where the Money Is: Reduce Workforce Costs" (Re: Mr. Churchill)
Yoshie Furuhashi
furuhashi.1 at osu.edu
Sat Feb 5 09:20:06 PST 2005
John Lacny wrote:
>The issue, quite plainly, is that this is a witch-hunt, where the
>right is taking out an easy target first, in preparation for
>clamping down on everyone. Case in point, the "academic bill of
>rights" in Ohio and other places. If they succeed with Churchill,
>they are eventually coming for you. Your more "humanist" pretensions
>will not save you when the Red Channels crew starts accusing you of
>"indoctrination," and when some thin-skinned, asshole right-wing
>student reports you to David Horowitz or Daniel Pipes for
>challenging racism or something like that. This is not the kind of
>facile "slippery slope" argument favored by ACLU fundamentalists,
>either. This is a realistic assessment of the political situation
Groups promoting David Horowitz' "Academic Bill of Rights [sic]" have
a clear anti-working-class agenda.
Note that the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC)
<http://www.alec.org/viewpage.cfm?pgname=5.02> is working hand in
hand with "Students for Academic Freedom [sic]":
<blockquote>Letter from the National Campus Director
May 14, 2004
<http://studentsforacademicfreedom.org/letters/LettersApr-Jun2004/letter-ALEC051404.htm>
A Step Forward for Academic Freedom
Dear Students and Supporters,
I am thrilled to be able to announce a major step forward for the
Academic Bill of Rights. At its Spring Task Force Summit in Austin,
Texas the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), adopted both
a model resolution and model statutory language based on the Academic
Bill of Rights and agreed to work with Students for Academic Freedom
to press for the adoption of this legislation in all fifty states.
ALEC is a bi-partisan body composed of over 2,400 state legislative
officials from across the United States. Over 100 ALEC members hold
senior leadership positions in their state legislatures, while
hundreds more hold important committee leadership positions. The
support of these legislators will be crucial to promoting the
academic freedom campaign across the nation.
Containing language nearly identical to the Academic Bill of Rights,
the model bill holds that students "have a right to expect a learning
environment in which they will have access to a broad range of
serious scholarly opinion pertaining to the subjects they study."
The bill also echoes the guidelines on academic freedom which were
first written nearly a century ago by the AAUP, stating that
"Students have a right to expect that their academic freedom and the
quality of their education will not be infringed by instructors who
persistently introduce controversial matter into the classroom or
coursework that has no relation to their subject of study and that
serves no legitimate pedagogical purpose."
If passed, this bill would require the governing board of each
institution of higher education to "develop institutional guidelines
and policies to protect academic freedom and the rights of students
and faculty" and to "adopt a grievance procedure by which a student
or faculty member may seek redress of grievance for an alleged
violation of any of the rights specified" in the bill.
The full text of the model bill and model resolution can be found on
our website.
We are grateful that ALEC's members have recognized the importance of
this legislation and expect that with the organization's support the
Academic Bill of Rights will be adopted by more than twenty states
within the next year.
The past week brings exciting legislative news as well. Legislators
in at least ten states are moving to introduce legislation based on
the Academic Bill of Rights, including Missouri, Michigan, Oklahoma,
Massachusetts, California, Utah, Washington and Ohio.
During a series of meetings in Washington last week, David Horowitz
met with Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL) who has agreed to sponsor a
resolution based on the Academic Bill of Rights in the U.S. Senate in
September. This legislation would accompany House Concurrent
Resolution 318, introduced last fall by United States Congressman
Jack Kingston (R-GA), which calls for colleges and universities to
voluntarily end discrimination in hiring practices based on political
or religious beliefs and to promote intellectual diversity on campus.
It's been an incredibly successful week for Students for Academic
Freedom. Make sure to check our website frequently for the latest
news on all these emerging developments. For more information about
our organization or on how to start a campus chapter, please contact
me at sara at studentsforacademicfreedom.org or at 202-969-2467.
Yours in Freedom,
Sara Dogan
National Campus Director
Students for Academic Freedom</blockquote>
The title of one of ALEC's publications says it all: William D.
Eggers, "Show Me The Money: Budget-Cutting Strategies for
Cash-Strapped States"
(<http://www.alec.org/meSWFiles/pdf/ShowMeTheMoney2.pdf>, July
2002). Eggers is "Senior Fellow, Manhattan Institute for Policy
Research & Director, Deloitte Research." His recommendation: "Go
Where the Money Is: Reduce Workforce Costs" (p. 4). Regarding higher
education, this is what he has to say:
<blockquote>Eliminate phantom positions: When agencies and higher
education institutions receive funding for a certain employment
level, invariably a percentage of the positions are never filled.
Eliminating these positions is a relatively painless way to extract
workforce savings from agency budgets.Many of the positions
eliminated in Florida fell into this category." (p. 4)</blockquote>
<blockquote>Tie funding for higher education institution to
performance: To balance budgets, a number of states are reducing
their support to higher education institutions. However, instead of
just mindlessly cutting college and university budgets, state
legislatures should use this opportunity to rethink their whole
approach to higher education. Because much of their funding comes not
from state legislatures but from tuition fees, research grants, and
endowments, state colleges and universities should be given more
freedom to set tuition rates and exempted from various state
procurement and personnel regulations.39 Such freedom is necessary
for them to thrive in the increasingly competitive marketplace of the
least effective and efficient job training programs based on the
measures might be consolidated into the high-performing programs or
eliminated outright" (p. 10)</blockquote>
<blockquote>Higher education is one area often rife with duplication
and overlap. In most states, too many colleges and universities are
doing too much of the same thing. "There is no need to have 13 Ph.D.
programs in history," an Ohio Senate staffer told _Governing_
magazine."Maybe we're better served to have two in the state, one in
the north and one in the south . . . We want to start to specialize,
especially in graduate education."44 (p. 12)</blockquote>
They are thinking, "Let's milk this Ward Churchill affair, begin a
new round of attacks on tenure, establish state control over hiring,
firing, promoting of faculty, and see if we can get away with
eliminating ethnic studies, Black studies, women's studies, peace
studies, anthropology, maybe even sociology, etc. and reduce the size
of history and English while we are at it. Never liked them anyway!
Too many Tenured Radicals! Their students are liable to support
campus workers on strike! Besides they are 'rife with duplication
and overlap.'"
--
Yoshie
* Critical Montages: <http://montages.blogspot.com/>
* Greens for Nader: <http://greensfornader.net/>
* Bring Them Home Now! <http://www.bringthemhomenow.org/>
* OSU-GESO: <http://www.osu-geso.org/>
* Calendars of Events in Columbus:
<http://sif.org.ohio-state.edu/calendar.html>,
<http://www.freepress.org/calendar.php>, & <http://www.cpanews.org/>
* Student International Forum: <http://sif.org.ohio-state.edu/>
* Committee for Justice in Palestine: <http://www.osudivest.org/>
* Al-Awda-Ohio: <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Al-Awda-Ohio>
* Solidarity: <http://www.solidarity-us.org/>
More information about the lbo-talk
mailing list