[lbo-talk] Churchill's complaint

[ravi]

Michael Dawson wrote:
>>Sometimes, the best thing you can do is to piss your enemies off to the
>>point they start blindly lashing out.  That makes them more vulnerable, so
>>wait for the opportune moment and go for the kill.  "By any means
>>necessary."
>
> I remain stunned at the range of leftists who seem incapable of reasoning
> their way through this disaster.  Do you genuinely think O'Reilly and gang
> are "pissed off" about Churchill?  How'd you get so naïve?  Dude, they're
> gloating.  They've found their proof that the left is laughable, unserious,
> immoral, boneheaded, hypocritical, and in favor of repeating murderous
> errors.  The "anger" is merely an act.  They're laughing their asses off at
> us.
> 

i would agree with the above, except bush, o'reilly, ann coulter, and
gang are laughable, unserious, immoral, boneheaded, hypocritical and in
favour of repeating murderous errors. but that has not in any way
tarnished the way they are perceived by the public or affected their
popularity.

i am not sure what that means in the larger sense, but it is only us
leftists who seem to care about hypocrisy, rationality/logic,
consistency, stuff like that. i continue to believe that any sort of
sustainable progress has to be based on such things, but i see a
catch-22 here....

	--ravi