[lbo-talk] Terrain of Struggle was O'Reilly vs Churchill

[Michael Dawson]

Hey, Leigh:  How does the Stewart conviction bolster a bad precedent?  Let's
hear your analysis.  And, by the way, the conviction came from the Clinton
1996 terrorism act, not PATRIOT, as Andie Nach. Pointed out.

One wonder if you're a leftist because that's your way of turning your
ignorant farts into perfume...


> -----Original Message-----
> From: lbo-talk-bounces at lbo-talk.org [mailto:lbo-talk-bounces at lbo-talk.org]
> On Behalf Of Leigh Meyers
> Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2005 9:27 PM
> To: leigh_m; lbo-talk
> Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] Terrain of Struggle was O'Reilly vs Churchill
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Doug Henwood
> To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
> Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 11:16 AM
> Subject: RE: [lbo-talk] Terrain of Struggle was O'Reilly vs Churchill
> 
> 
> Michael Dawson wrote:
> 
> >Personally, I don't see the witch-hunt in the Churchill case
> 
> Then you need new glasses or something.
> 
> Doug
> 
> ====
> 
> Out of that same quote:
> 
> "...and I don'tsee the outrage in the Lynn Stewart affair."
> 
> You don't see any danger in the DoJ building a body
> of successful case-law to bolster the Patriot Act?
> 
> Doug.... More than glasses...
> 
> Leigh
> 
> 
> 
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.306 / Virus Database: 266.1.0 - Release Date: 2/18/2005
> 
> 
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk