[lbo-talk] The Plan: Explained

snit snat snitilicious at tampabay.rr.com
Sun Feb 20 09:42:37 PST 2005


old, but funny -- and most people won't care or notice -- because this is the way many people in corporate 'merika speak!

Sticking my finger to the LBO wind, I'm wondering what the sentiment is here. How likely is it that this will pass more or less like it is. worse than it is once the dems help? :o

no chance at all?

WOMAN IN AUDIENCE: I don't really understand. How is it the new [Social Security] plan is going to fix that problem?

SHRUBYA Because the -- all which is on the table begins to address the big cost drivers. For example, how benefits are calculated, for example, is on the table. Whether or not benefits rise based upon wage increases or price increases. There's a series of parts of the formula that are being considered. And when you couple that, those different cost drivers, affecting those -- changing those with personal accounts, the idea is to get what has been promised more likely to be -- or closer delivered to what has been promised. Does that make any sense to you? It's kind of muddled. Look, there's a series of things that cause the -- like, for example, benefits are calculated based upon the increase of wages, as opposed to the increase of prices. Some have suggested that we calculate -- the benefits will rise based upon inflation, as opposed to wage increases. There is a reform that would help solve the red if that were put into effect. In other words, how fast benefits grow, how fast the promised benefits grow, if those -- if that growth is affected, it will help on the red.

-- Shrubya explaining the NEW, IMPROVED! Social Security plan, Tampa, Florida, Feb. 4, 2005

http://slate.msn.com/id/2113276/

"We live under the Confederacy. We're a podunk bunch of swaggering pious hicks."

--Bruce Sterling



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list