[lbo-talk] Terrain of Struggle was O'Reilly vs Churchill

Miles Jackson cqmv at pdx.edu
Tue Feb 22 08:56:26 PST 2005


On Mon, 21 Feb 2005, Charles Brown wrote:


> CB: What you say is true. However, the problem is there is no evidence of
> the status of social security funds that can be gotten from anything other
> than people. So, if those people lie or are biased, your available
> "evidence" might be false.
>
> Thus in court, a witness's biases , and thus motives,are pertinent in
> judging the reliability of her testimony. It is not an _ad hominem_ fallacy
> to present evidence of a witness's bias, i.e. motives.

Fortunately for all of us, the world isn't a courtroom. The passage above implies that human knowledge is the product of single individuals whose claims are not tainted by motives or biases. I think it's more useful to acknowledge that human knowledge is a product of social relations and social organizations. For instance, I can trust a climatologist's claim about global warming because their work has undergone intense scrutiny by well educated peers. Knowing anything at all about the motives of the climatologist is beside the point.

Miles



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list