[lbo-talk] Poor, white and pissed II

Doug Henwood dhenwood at panix.com
Wed Feb 23 15:28:28 PST 2005


T Fast wrote:


>Chuck wrote
>
>>The reasons for this are very simple. The American Left, broadly
>>speaking (including liberals), is not going to regain a widespread
>>constituency until it adopts a populist, i.e. *libertarian*,
>>program and rhetoric. This means that in order to beat the right
>>wing, the Left has to look more anarchist or libertarian leftist.
>----
>tfast replies:
>
>Well one can be anarchist without being libertarian which is simply
>another strand of liberalism albeit headed in a different direction
>(Hayek). In general, I would agree that any form of left populism
>will have to involve a serious dose of anarchism insofar as it
>relates to a critique of the centralized state and expresses some
>notion of community autonomy. Anarcho-socialism may be the way of
>the future. I just wonder how you are going to square your vision
>of individual autonomy and liberty with some notion that the
>community can interefere in the individual's right to
>purchase/control/own/sell the social means of (re)production? And if
>the coummunity has such power how is this to be analytically and
>popularily understood as different from what governement does / is?

And what about all those Americans who like to be told what to do, and who admire authoritarian institutions like the military, the church, and the cops?

Doug



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list