> You're missing my point. I am not skepticism about the existence of
> real patterns; I'm skeptical about the claim that science at one
> particular point in time accurately represents those patterns with
> its models. (In other words, I have faith in scientific progress!)
>
> Miles
You're sort of missing mine. When I said, "...isn't cause for skepticism of any sort," I meant both ontological and epistemic skepticism. Yes, we should be aware of the fact that some of our current models aren't as accurate as future models will be. I don't think any scientist would beg to disagree. Most of them are also fans of scientific progress. (Unless perhaps it's their model that others are threatening to overturn :) )
-- Luke