there's people's _subjective_ perception, but as Marx showed, there is also a way to look at the issue of _classes_ that really does have to do with relation to the means of production. Even Marx didn't say it was simply as either you either own them or you don't. Marx only said that, as crises advanced the world would eventually be composed of two classes at a standoff, with the myriad classes eventually taking one side or the other.
kelley
At 04:58 PM 1/21/2005, Turbulo at aol.com wrote:
>Carrol Cox wrote:
>
> >An analysis of this situation that endlessly invokes a mythical "middle
> >class" is simply not serious.
>
>You've got a serious point with this, but most Americans believe
>they're middle class. What do you do, tell them they're deluded? Tell
>them to substitute something less appealing for their aspirational
>self-ID?
>
>Doug
>
> ******************
>
>Yes, this is what you have to tell them in one way or another.Unless
>people discard their illusions and face their reality, nothing much will
>ever change. Why should anyone want to transform his/her reality if s/he
>doesn't perceive it as unappealing?
>
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
"We live under the Confederacy. We're a podunk bunch of swaggering pious hicks."
--Bruce Sterling