[lbo-talk] Meth is king?

[Michael Perelman]

Writing from the supposed meth capital in Butte County, I believe that meth
production would be hard to disguise in an urban setting.  Right now our streams have
detectable levels of meth.  People just dump their crap outside even though meth
labs have a good deal of hazardous material, according to the local press. In rural
areas, the police are spread relatively thin.

On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 07:05:53PM +0100, Wendy Lyon wrote:
> On 7/7/05, joanna <123hop at comcast.net> wrote:
> > Does anyone know why Meth use is spreading in rural areas
> > 
> > http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/05/AR2005070501081.html
> > 
> > I think I tried it once, and it was most unpleasant. What exactly is the
> > attraction -- or do people have to use it because of work?
> 
> "Unpleasant" is certainly a matter of opinion.  I used to love the buzz from it.
> 
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk

-- 
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu