http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050707/ap_on_re_mi_ea/israel_britain_explosions_1
We have a series of reports coming forward, which do not necessarily add up. Perhaps they will in time, but so far, the investigation is ongoing.
Joe W.
>From: Simon Huxtable <jetfromgladiators at yahoo.com>
>Reply-To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
>To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
>Subject: [lbo-talk] Re: London - Amnesia Express
>Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 11:17:29 +0100 (BST)
>
> > Unless you know something everybody else does not,
> > the question of who
> > carried out the bombings in london remains a
> > mystery. The idea that they
> > might have been carried out by right-wing extremists
> > is, at this point as
> > plausible a scenario as anything else.
>
>No, it is not. Here is the evidence against it:
>(from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4676861.stm)
>
># All four suspects were British nationals of
>Pakistani descent. Three of the four were from West
>Yorkshire
>
># All four were captured on CCTV at King's Cross
>station, wearing rucksacks, shortly before 0830 BST on
>the morning of the attacks. The footage was found on
>Monday night
>
># One suspect was reported missing by his family. Some
>of his belongings were found on the bombed Number 30
>bus in Tavistock Square
>
># Property linked to a second man was found at the
>scene of the Aldgate/Liverpool Street Tube bomb
>
># Items belonging to a third suspect were found at the
>site of the Aldgate/Liverpool Street and Edgware Road
>Tube bombs
>
># It is very likely the three men whose belongings
>were found at the bomb scenes are dead, police sources
>say.
>
>
> > I think it is *your* smarts that are in question
> > here Doug, and not only
> > your smarts, but your sense of fairness and
> > impartiality. The fact is: we
> > don't know who did it. Why are you acting as though
> > we do?
>
>What does 'fairness' mean in this context? Fairness
>towards what or whom? Fairness towards the evidence?
>On the basis of the evidence I cited above, I think it
>is fairer to conclude that the bombing was perpetrated
>by British Muslims and not Neo-Nazis.
>
>The latter claim seems to be predicated on the fact
>that the far right has perpetrated atrocities in the
>past and therefore might had done so again. It might
>be argued that Islamic terrorism has been blamed on
>'past form' too. But the evidence overwhelmingly
>points to it as the cause.
>
>You may have cited the Madsen piece for interest, but
>the only interest for me is that it's not particularly
>useful.
>
>So, I would ask what limits does your fairness stretch
>to? Which ideas can be considered 'implausible'? On
>what grounds can the decision between plausible and
>implausible be made?
>
> > p.s. as we speak, Scotland Yard investigators are
> > busily 'conspiracy
> > theorising' about who may have carried out these
> > attacks. (that is what they
> > do, in case you didn't know)
>
>I'm afraid I do place more trust in the Scotland Yard
>investgators than someone sitting at home like Madsen
>who seems to have been watching the events on TV
>wearing a paper hat with 'detective' written on in
>biro.
>
>Simon
>
>
>
>
>
>
>___________________________________________________________
>Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with
>voicemail http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
_________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/