[lbo-talk] Amnesia Express

[Joseph Wanzala]

- doesn't matter whether my 'wares' have anything in common with Chomsky's. 
The 'laws' of reading comprehension, or any laws or principles governing the 
way we think and act - are not (or should not be) selective or arbitrary - 
what is good for the goose is good for the gander. As a 'smart guy', you 
should know this. You should not be able to say there are a general set of 
rules, but they don't apply to you. This, incidentally, is also known as 
'discrimination'.

There are however, many areas in which I concur with Mr. Chomsker - indeed 
one interesting instance where my wares and Chomsky's are indentical are 
with respect to his views on the Lockerbie Bombing - another signal event 
where the official story is at variance with known facts and any efforts to 
question the official dogma is dimissed as conspiracy theory.

http://www.e-text.org/text/Chomsky%20-%20libya.rtf

Joe W.


>From: Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com>
>Reply-To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
>To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
>Subject: RE: [lbo-talk] Amnesia Express
>Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 18:56:31 -0400
>
>Joseph Wanzala wrote:
>
>>Chomsky's analysis below (which in some respects also applies to some of 
>>his own positions) applies to the (very unfortunate) tendency of lbo'ers 
>>to dismiss as 'conspiratorial' or 'conspiracy theory' any ideas that 
>>deviate from mainstream conventional wisdom.
>
>If you think that the kind of stuff you retail has anything in common with 
>Chomsky, I really have to doubt your powers of reading comprehension.
>
>Doug
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk

_________________________________________________________________
Don’t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! 
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/