Please re-read the exhange in its entirety in the archives.
The evidence actually points to Heartfield operating sleazily: sliming those who disagree with him by associating their opinions with the BNP, accusing others of believing that the victims "had it coming," twisting and hyperbolizing others statements and then re-attributing same, etc.
To remind, this all came after he urged all to ignore what look to be plausible proximate motivations for the bombings. This is actually sound advice which Heartfield himself heeded for the space of about 10 words. He then went on chalk the bombings up variously to Islamic 'obscurantism' and anti-modernism.
If Carl was sneering at anyone it was at Heartfield, who is richly deserving of it. To accuse him of delighting in the killings is slanderous.
____________________________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs