[lbo-talk] KPFA Agonisties

Joseph Wanzala jwanzala at hotmail.com
Tue Jul 19 14:16:26 PDT 2005


p.s. Dennis Bernstein and Wendell Harper are the only two full time staff still at the station from the Pat Scott era who voted against the removal of the unpaid staff and the switch to the CWA.


>From: "Joseph Wanzala" <jwanzala at hotmail.com>
>Reply-To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
>To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
>Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] KPFA Agonisties
>Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 13:55:34 -0700
>
>
>Responding to Doug variously (see below):
>
>I think others have already contributed to an understanding of why yours is
>not a good analogy. I would add that there are three key things to keep in
>mind:
>
>(1) Staff, through representation on the Local Station Board *did* (do)
>play a role in hiring the GM. In fact, during the GM hire process, the
>listener representative Riva Enteen, Sepideh Khosrowjah and Michael Lubin
>were removed and/or quit the Hiring Committee because of disagreements with
>the staff reps (led by Sasha Lilley) /and pro-management reps (led by
>Marnie Tattersall) so that faction effectively had control over selecting
>the two finalists in the GM hire. The Executive Director Dan Coughlin made
>the final decision.
>
>(2) When Roy took office the listener reps on the board (wrongly, but based
>on what transpired in the hiring process) viewed him as a
>pro-staff/management hire. This staff manangement alliance collapsed when
>Roy Campanella turned out to be his own man and did not carry water for the
>staff, and had the audacity to revist the Democracy Now/Morning Show time
>change as well as being even-handedly supportive of all programmers -
>including the much maligned Dennis Bernstein and his Flashpoints team - who
>he had been told, early in his tenure, by the staff at the station (who at
>the time viewed him as their hire and hopefully their hatchet man), was one
>of the problems he was supposed to 'fix'. Incidentally the campaign to fire
>Roy is also a campaign to get rid of Flashpoints.
>
>(3) For many eons, KPFA workers - paid and unpaid - were members of the
>United Electrical Workers. A key component of the Pat Scott effort to
>pacify Pacifica in the 1990s included mass purges of unpaid staff. In order
>to effect this, Scott & Co . realized that they had to get rid of the
>collective bargaining rights of the unpaid staff. SO, CIRCA 1996, MANY OF
>THE STAFF AT NOW COMPLAINING THAT THEIR RIGHTS AS WORKERS ARE BEING
>TRAMPLED ON, VOTED TO LEAVE THE UEW, AND JOIN THE COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF
>AMERICA AND AS PART OF THE DEAL, TO EXCLUDE UNPAID STAFF FROM THE UNION.
>THIS ENTIRE PROCESS WAS PRESIDED OVER BY THE AMERICAN CONSULTING GROUP, A
>NOTORIOUS UNIION BUSTING OUTFIT. - why is this important apart from what is
>obvious? A major program at KPFA is money. There are too many FTEs in the
>budget. Efforts to address this problem are being cast as union busting. In
>other words, the defition of 'work' has been narrowed to include only those
>who get paid - and the unpaid staff, even though nominally acknowledged as
>'workers' are not deemed to have any rights.
>
>Doug, the listenership has been defined as anyone who listens. The
>membership is those who make a financial contribution. This is the same for
>all public radio stations. If the electorate is dominated by 'oddballs',
>well Doug, I suggest sending them off to Guantanamo for a little
>re-education, I really see no other alternative here, do you?
>
>Lastly, on a more serious note, yes, Pacifica governance is pretty screwed
>up - by not any more so than the Sierra Club, or any other major
>member-based non-profit organization with a democratic governance model.
>The issue is whether you take the position that it is all a waste of time
>and hopeless (as you seem to) , or if you take the position, as I do, that
>if enough good people (broadly defined) put enough Sisyphusian energy into
>making Pacifica work, then perhaps, someday we shall all be free.'
>
>Joe W.
>
>___________________
>
>Doug wrote: How do you feel about workers at other institutions selecting
>their manager and having control over the workplace? Would that be a good
>model for a ball-bearing factory, but not a radio station? Or should the
>ball-bearing workers just yield to management too?
>
>There are a lot of complicated issues here. How do you define the
>listenership? Are there residency requirements? The kind of programming the
>station features will, to a large extent, determine the listenership. What
>if that programming is so weird and marginal that the listenership dwindles
>to a hardy band of weird, marginal survivors? Are they the constituency?
>What if the electorate is domianted by the oddballs who have nothing better
>to do with their lives? How can that listenership, however defined,
>understand who the candidates are, and what the issues are? The actual
>practice of current Pacifica governance, however it sounds on paper, is
>pretty screwed up.
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on how to
>get there! http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=Retirement
>
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk

_________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list