Your statements are a textbook case of shifting the burden of proof and appealing to ignorance. Miracles, by definition, are improbable -- they are said to be rare and to defy known physical laws (otherwise, they wouldn't be miraculous -- merely ordinary). Those who make an improbable claim, such as making or witnessing miracles, are the ones who must prove it, not the other way around.
Why is appeal to ignorance so commonly used, even by such intelligent and well educated individuals like yourself? That's the question that intrigues me. -- Yoshie
* Critical Montages: <http://montages.blogspot.com/> * Monthly Review: <http://monthlyreview.org/> * Greens for Nader: <http://greensfornader.net/> * Bring Them Home Now! <http://www.bringthemhomenow.org/> * Calendars of Events in Columbus: <http://sif.org.ohio-state.edu/calendar.html>, <http://www.freepress.org/calendar.php>, & <http://www.cpanews.org/> * Student International Forum: <http://sif.org.ohio-state.edu/> * Committee for Justice in Palestine: <http://www.osudivest.org/> * Al-Awda-Ohio: <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Al-Awda-Ohio> * Solidarity: <http://www.solidarity-us.org/>