[lbo-talk] Appeal to Ignorance

Carrol Cox cbcox at ilstu.edu
Sun Jun 12 09:42:42 PDT 2005


joanna wrote:
>
> Because the question of "God" is a lot more complicated and interesting
> than the fundies or rabid atheists make it out to be.
>
But you haven't given us any reason for believing that the question is either interesting or complicated. I can easily say that the question of the large five-legged invisible frog sitting in my kitchen is complicated and interesting, but I doubt that anyone would pay much attention to me.

And why can't you say "atheists" rather than "rabid atheists"? Are atheists "rabid" by definition? If not, what is the difference between an "ordinary atheist" and a "rabid atheist"? You are throwing pejorative labels around without making any serious attempt to lay out, even crudely, the grounds for that kind of labelling.

Carrol



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list