--- ravi <gadfly at exitleft.org> wrote:
> a tangential thought: is the god hypothesis (which i
> do not subscribe
> to, btw) any sillier than a "lawful universe"
> hypothesis? because there
> is some (though not sufficient) "proof" for the
> latter?
What do you find silly about the idea of a lawful universe? What would you consider sufficient proof? Without some underlying organization, how could we exist, much less develop what predictive ability that we do have?
Andy
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com